Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 Okla. 179 - Earl v. Tyler

Earl v. Tyler’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 1937
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 1937

9 state decisions

40191219201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Summerville v. Stockton Milling Co. · Cobe v. Coughlin Hardware Co. · Jensen v. Dorr · Cobb v. Wm. Kenefick Co. · Hawkins v. Overstreet

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We are of the opinion that the Legislature intended to furnish a remedy, not alone to the landlords, within the usual legal meaning of the word, but to those entitled by reason of their title to remuneration for the use and occupation of lands occupied by another.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.