Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 ORAPP 547 - State v. Washington

State v. Washington’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1981
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[PROSECUTOR]: * * * [Defense counsel] on voir dire has indicated to the jury that his Defendant has been convicted of a crime. "Of course, that's fine, but I would ask the Court to caution any possible impeachment of him on direct examination if he does take the stand because I'm afraid it would preclude me from offering the judgment rolls themselves which I do intend to offer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(Opinion at pate 25.) True, but how does that sense of atmosphere affect the relevance of evidence? Second, the majority says that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(opinion at page 25), but does not even discuss the matter of prejudice. It is well established that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.