Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

36 Pa. Super. 69

Griesmer v. Hill

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1908

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1908-04-20

Appeal, No. 30, Jan. T., 1908, by defendant, from order of C. P. Luzerne Co., Oct. T., 1906, No. 321, discharging rule to strike off judgment in case of Jacob Griesmer v. James Lewis Hill and James C. Hill. Rule to strike off judgment. Ferris, J., filed the following opinion: On July 6, 1906, the plaintiff sued out a writ of replevin, returnable on the second Monday of September, 1906, for certain chattels alleged to be in the possession of the defendants.

Affirmed · Decided 1908-04-20

Per Curiam,

¶1The question raised by this appeal was well worthy of consideration. It has received such consideration in the opinion filed by the learned judge below, and while there is much plausibility in the argument presented by appellant’s counsel in support of their position, we are nevertheless led to conclude that the court below properly construed the statute as entitling the plaintiff, to a judgment at the time it was entered. The reasons for this conclusion are fully and clearly set f.orth in the .opinion of the learned judge, in which we concur.

¶2The judgment is affirmed.

/36/pasuper/69 · .json · Public domain