Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 SC 497 - State v. Reeder

State v. Reeder’s Empirical Analysis

1892

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
April 1924
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 1924

3 state decisions

101892190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The motive and intent is not a matter of inquiry. It is the act. It is the fact. If he sells it and disposes of it knowing that the superior lien exists, and gets it out of the way, that implies fraud.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.