36 S.D. 167
Decided August 28, 1915
South Dakota Supreme Court · decided 1915-08-28
<p>Appeals — Review—Unremedied Want of Assignments of Error— Affirmance.</p> <p>There being no assignments of error on this appeal, and the defect not having been remedied after respondent’s brief mentions the defeat, there is nothing for review, and the order appealed from is affirmed.</p>
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 1947
4 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1915-08-28
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1This is apparently an appeal from a taxation of, costs. There is no assignment of errors; consequently there is nothing before us for review. As in the case of McCall v. Crocker, — S. D. — 153 N. W. 761, this defect was called to the attention of appellant in respondents brief, but the same was not remedied.
¶2The order appealed from is affirmed.