¶1On June 17, 1915, on a hearing had upon an order to show cause why the settled record and the appellant’s brief herein should not be stricken from the files and records of this action, it was by this court ordered that such settled record and brief be stricken; and, upon a rehearing had, this court, upon August 7th, refused to disturb its former order herein. Inasmuch as the striking of said brief from the files leaves nothing before this court for consideration, the judgment'and order appealed from are affirmed.
36 S.D. 184
Horton v. White
Decided August 25, 1915
South Dakota Supreme Court · decided 1915-08-25
<p>Appeal — Affirmance—Settled Record Stricken, Rehearing, Refused— Procedure).</p> <p>Settled record and appellant’s brief having been stricken from files, and, upon rehearing, the order striking record remaining undisturbed, nothing is left for consideration by Supreme Court; and affirmance follows.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1926
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1915-08-25
View the full empirical analysis of this case →