State v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Florida v. Royer · California v. Hodari D. · 441 So. 2d 1195 - State v. Belton · 626 So. 2d 707 - State v. Tucker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“instruction to remove [the defendant's] hands from his pocket ... was based on concerns for officer safety and did not communicate an intent to stop, seize, or search the defendant”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In the first tier, there is no seizure or Fourth Amendment concern during mere communication with police officers and citizens where there is no coercion or detention. State v. Fisher, 97-1133 (La.9/9/98), 720 So.2d 1179, 1183 . The second tier consists of brief seizures of a person, under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), if the officer has an objectively reasonable suspicion, supported by specific and ar-ticulable facts, that the person is, or is about to be, engaged in criminal activity. Fisher, 720 So.2d at 1183 . The third tier is custodial arrest where an officer needs probable cause to believe that the person has committed a crime. Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.