36 So. 3d 533 - Williams v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 557 So. 2d 1249 - Bean v. Craig · Johnson v. State · 566 So. 2d 723 - Dairyland Ins. Co. v. Jackson · 456 So. 2d 1047 - Dominex, Inc. v. Key · 723 So. 2d 634 - Equity Resources Management, Inc. v. Vinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“res judicata does not require complete identity, but only that the party against whom res judicata is asserted was either a party or in privity with a party to the prior action or that the non-party's interests were adequately represented by a party in the prior suit, and the relationship between the party and non-party is not so attenuated as to violate due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.