Tull v. Turley’s Empirical Analysis
1931
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gussie Fox v. Dallas Hotel Co. · Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Washington · Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. McGlamory · Colorado &. S. Ry. Co. v. Rowe · Holloway Seed Co. v. City National Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘The rule, “Res inter alios acta,” precludes introduction of evidence of transactions by which the proponent was in no way affected and to which he was in no sense a party. Levine Bros. v. Mantell, 90 W.Va. 166 , 111 S.E. 501 , 504’. [37 Words and Phrases, p. 479] Pierce v. Wimberly, 78 Tex. 187 , 14 S. W. 454 ; Griffith v. Lake, Tex., 12 S.W. 285 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.