Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 SW2D 446 - Askey v. Power

Askey v. Power’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 2008

19 state decisions

6019311940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kelly v. Gibbs · Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. Speights · Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. Parker · Patrick v. Pierce · 27 Tex. Civ. App. 188 - Stewart v. Robbins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The right to a judgment lien is purely statutory, and the statute must be substantially complied with before the lien will attach. * * * “No lien attaches until the abstract has been properly recorded and indexed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.