Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 SW3D 199 - Tuy Pham v. State

Tuy Pham v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2005
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 177th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Guzman v. State · Romero v. State · Carmouche v. State · King v. State · Johnson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “reliability determination, the trial court's ultimate holding was that Dr. Pelz's opinions would not be helpful to the jury, anticipating our decision in Peters . [1] Appellant was a juvenile who was certified to stand trial as an adult. [2] In our original Pham opinion, we stated,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A child may not be left unattended in a juvenile processing office and is entitled to be accompanied by the child's parent, guardian, or other custodian or by the child's attorney.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he Texas Family Code expressly makes Chapter 38 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure applicable to juvenile proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.