Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

36 S.W.3d 409

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 2001

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2001-01-16

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 2014

10 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-01-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Tinya Williams (“Movant”) appeals the trial court’s judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum, for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/36/sw3d/409 · .json · Public domain