Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 SW3D 809 - River Fleets, Inc. v. Creech

River Fleets, Inc. v. Creech’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bank of Washington v. McAuliffe · Missouri Health Care Ass'n v. Attorney General · C.C. Dillon Co. v. City of Eureka · Akin v. Director of Revenue · Lett v. City of St. Louis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A cause of action is rendered moot when an event occurs making it impossible for the court to grant relief. In order to grant a declaratory judgment, a trial court must have a justicable controversy before it. ‘A justicable controversy exists where the plaintiff has a legally protectable interest at stake, a substantial controversy exists between the parties with genuinely adverse interests, and that controversy is ripe for judicial determination.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The court may modify, reverse or reverse and remand the determination of fees and other expenses if the court finds that the award or failure to make an award of fees and other expenses, or the calculation of the amount of the award, was arbitrary and capricious, was unreasonable, was unsupported by competent and substantial evidence, or was made contrary to law or in excess of the court’s jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.