36 Tex. 193
Decided July 1, 1872
Texas Supreme Court · decided 1872-07-01
<p>Error from Denton. Tried below before the Hon. C. C. Binkley.</p> <p>No occasion for a statement of the facts.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1872-07-01
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 1935
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The plaintiff in this case, by her petition filed in the District Court, does not bring herself within the rule of the statute. (Paschal’s Digest, Article 3422. See also Murphy v. Coffey, 33 Texas, 508.)
¶2The defendant in error is a feme covert. She is apparently suing for community property, and her husband is not a party to the suit. The judgment of the District Court is reversed, and the cause dismissed without prejudice.
¶3Reversed and dismissed.