Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 TEX 6 - Long v. State

Long v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1872

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
8
states following
August 2005
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently August 2005

1 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

3018721880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Many of the Codes of the different States declare in express terms, that before the party can be visited with the increased penalty, it must appear that the subsequent offense was committed after the conviction of the former offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.