Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 U.S. 229 - Jackson v. Ashton

Jackson v. Ashton’s Empirical Analysis

36 U.S. 229 · 1837

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
June 2005
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2005

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

40183718401850186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hugh Wallace v. Mary Wormley · Stephen Harding v. Asa Handy · Wendell v. Van Rensselaer · Fowler v. Shearer · Underhill v. Van Cortlandt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A court of chancery will often refuse to enforce a contract, specifically, when it would also refuse to annul it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.