Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 Va. App. 205 - Howerton v. Commonwealth

36 Va. App. 205 - Howerton v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Stamper v. Commonwealth · Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Liepelt · 28 Va. App. 306 - Baker v. Commonwealth · Commonwealth v. Baker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We have held that compliance with [the challenged statute] relating to procedures for instituting proceedings against juveniles is mandatory and jurisdictional. The failure to strictly follow the notice procedures contained in the Code deny the defendant a substantive right.”); Caccioppo v. Commonwealth, 20 Va.App. 534, 537 , 458 S.E.2d 592, 594 (1995) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.