36 Va. App. 8 - Dickerson v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2004
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Britt v. North Carolina · Higginbotham v. Commonwealth · 14 Va. App. 53 - Buchanan v. Buchanan · 11 Va. App. 535 - Rollston v. Commonwealth · Cabaniss v. Cunningham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“argument, authority, or citations to the record” do not merit appellate consideration. Thomas v. Commonwealth, 38 Va.App. 319 , 321 n. 1, 563 S.E.2d 406 , 407 n. 1 (2002); Dickerson v. Commonwealth, 36 Va.App. 8, 15 , 548 S.E.2d 230, 234 (2001); Bennett v. Commonwealth, 35 Va.App. 442, 452 , 546 S.E.2d 209, 213 (2001); Buchanan v. Buchanan, 14 Va.App. 53, 56 , 415 S.E.2d 237, 239 (1992). . See also United States v. Biocic, 928 F.2d 112, 116 (4th Cir.1991) (finding no right to public nudity under”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“argument, authority or citations to the record”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.