36 Wash. App. 174 - State v. Mayville’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A party appealing a decision subject to these rules must file a notice of appeal in the superior court within the time provided by rule 2.5. This is the only jurisdictional requirement for an appeal."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“is jurisdictional and should not be extended”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Cases and issues will not be determined on the basis of compliance or noncompliance with these rules, except that a case will be dismissed without a decision on the merits for failure to timely file a notice of appeal in the superior court. . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.