Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 36 Wash. App. 174 - State v. Mayville

36 Wash. App. 174 - State v. Mayville’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"A party appealing a decision subject to these rules must file a notice of appeal in the superior court within the time provided by rule 2.5. This is the only jurisdictional requirement for an appeal."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “is jurisdictional and should not be extended”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Cases and issues will not be determined on the basis of compliance or noncompliance with these rules, except that a case will be dismissed without a decision on the merits for failure to timely file a notice of appeal in the superior court. . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.