36 Wash. App. 42 - State v. Hystad’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently August 2012 · most notably 64 Wash. App. 641 - State v. Huff (1992), State v. Scroggins (1986)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · McCarthy v. United States · Henderson v. Morgan · Smith v. O'Grady · In re Disbarment of Kleindienst
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The fact of temporary residence, personal possessions on the premises, or knowledge of the presence of an unlawful drug, without more, is insufficient to establish constructive possession of such drug or the intent to manufacture it.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Mere proximity to the drugs is not enough to establish constructive possession—it must be established that the defendant exercised dominion and control over either the drugs or the area in which they were found.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“defendant's bald claim of methadone-induced confusion does not meet the demanding standard required to show manifest injustice”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.