36 Wash. App. 582 - State v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 87 Wash. 2d 870 - State v. Striker · 90 Wash. 2d 423 - State v. Peterson · 94 Wash. 2d 690 - State v. Carpenter · 91 Wash. 2d 492 - State v. Alexus · 19 Wash. App. 860 - State v. Sulgrove
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[U]nlike the prior version, the most recent version of the speedy trial rules does not expressly exclude the time when a defendant is unavailable for the purpose of computing the date for arraignment. Both parties assume, and the assumption seems reasonable, that even under the current rules the time a defendant is unavailable should not be considered when determining the arraignment date.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“If the defendant is not detained in jail or subjected to conditions of release, the defendant shall be arraigned not later than 14 days after that appearance in superior court which next follows the filing of the information or indictment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“can be shown only if the prosecution demonstrates good faith and diligent efforts to obtain the availability of the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.