State v. Hicks’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
4
states following
May 1983
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Katz v. United States · Roe v. Wade · Griswold v. State of Connecticut · Meyer v. State of Nebraska
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. . [T]he classification must be reasonable, not arbitrary, and must rest upon some ground of difference having a fair and substantial relation to the object of the legislation, so that all persons similarly circumstanced shall be treated alike.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. J. K. · State v. J. K.““A person is guilty of patronizing a prostitute when: “(1) Pursuant to a prior agreement or understanding, he pays a fee to another person as compensation for that person’s having engaged in sexual conduct with him; or “(2) He pays or agrees to pay a fee to another person pursuant to an agreement or understanding that in return therefor that person or a third person will engage in sexual conduct with him; or “(3) He solicits or requests another person to engage in sexual conduct with him in return for a fee.” “Patronizing a prostitute is a violation.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Hicks v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.