Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 360 A.2d 150 - State v. Hicks

State v. Hicks’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
4
states following
May 1983
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Katz v. United States · Roe v. Wade · Griswold v. State of Connecticut · Meyer v. State of Nebraska

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. . [T]he classification must be reasonable, not arbitrary, and must rest upon some ground of difference having a fair and substantial relation to the object of the legislation, so that all persons similarly circumstanced shall be treated alike.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““A person is guilty of patronizing a prostitute when: “(1) Pursuant to a prior agreement or understanding, he pays a fee to another person as compensation for that person’s having engaged in sexual conduct with him; or “(2) He pays or agrees to pay a fee to another person pursuant to an agreement or understanding that in return therefor that person or a third person will engage in sexual conduct with him; or “(3) He solicits or requests another person to engage in sexual conduct with him in return for a fee.” “Patronizing a prostitute is a violation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.