Ridling v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
50
cited by 50 later decisions
2
states following
November 2019
most recently cited
48 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Parker v. State · Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Foote · Sheridan v. State · Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) The state is not required to prove jurisdiction or venue unless evidence is admitted that affirmatively shows that the court lacks jurisdiction or venue.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We have stated that 'when reviewing the evidence on a jurisdictional question, [we] need only determine whether there is substantial evidence to support the finding of jurisdiction.' [ Kirwan , 351 Ark. 603 , 96 S.W.3d 724 ]; Dunham v. State , 315 Ark. 580 , 581, 868 S.W.2d 496 , 497 (1994).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Torres v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.