Beckman v. Graves’s Empirical Analysis
360 F.2d 148 · 1966
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2010
7 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gully v. First Nat. Bank in Meridian · Minnesota v. United States · Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad · Koppers Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We hold the trial court properly allowed the removal of this action. Section 1365 of the act (7 U.S.C. 1365) vests concurrent jurisdiction in the state and federal courts and where original jurisdiction exists in the federal courts removal is allowed by 28 U.S.C. 1441(a) unless specifically prohibited by act of Congress. See Gully v. First National Bank, 299 U.S. 109 , 57 S.Ct. 96 , 81 L.Ed. 70 . Although the statute gives the farmer (appellant) a choice of forum, it does not guarantee that his choice shall remain undisturbed. And since the Agricultural Adjustment Act does not expressly prohibit removal as it could have done, Davis v. Joyner, D.C., 240 F.Supp. 689 , this court will not do it by implication or by ignoring the meaning of section 1441.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““If the farmer is dissatisfied with the determination of the review committee, he may, within fifteen days after a notice of such determination is mailed to him by registered mail or by certified mail, file a bill in equity against the review committee . . . ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Monohan v. Huey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.