Robert Jackson Jones v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden’s Empirical Analysis
360 F.2d 157 · 1966
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently March 2006 · most notably Rheuark v. Shaw (1980), Harris v. Champion (1994)
31 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Smith v. Kansas · Robert Lee Kelly v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden · Lee v. Kansas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“But an inordinate, excessive and inexcusable delay may very well amount to a denial of due process cognizable in federal court. Smith v. State of Kansas, 10th Cir., 356 F.2d 654 ; Kelly v. Crouse, Warden, 10th Cir., 352 F.2d 506 . Without knowing the facts and circumstances giving rise to the delay, the trial court certainly could not properly conclude that the petitioner's state remedies are adequate and effective.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Odsen v. Moore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.