Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

360 F.2d 165

Docket No. 15618.

United States v. Schoonover

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued April 19, 1966. Decided May 6, 1966.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1966-05-06

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1966

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1966-05-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Edwin Krawitz, Stroudsburg, Pa., for appellant.

Carlon M. O'Malley, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Scranton, Pa. (Bernard J. Brown, U.S Atty., Scranton, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before KALODNER, HASTIE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The appellant has been convicted under an indictment charging in several counts falsely uttering two separate checks, forging one check and mail fraud. On certain counts the appellant complains that the evidence did not justify conviction. Our independent examination of the record satisfies us that the evidence warranted a guilty verdict on each count. Other points concerning the court's charge and rulings on the admission of evidence have been considered, but we find no reversible error.

¶2

The judgment and sentence of the District Court will be affirmed.

/360/f2d/165 · .json · Public domain