Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

360 F.2d 212

Docket No. 22426.

Miller v. Huffstutler

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Feb. 21, 1966.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1966-02-21

2 counsel of record

Relies on In re Trice Production Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1966-02-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 1993

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

401966197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas; Joe W. Sheehy, Judge.

Philip I. Palmer, Jr., Philip I. Palmer, and Palmer, Green, Palmer & Gilmore, Dallas, Tex., for appellant.

F. Lee Lawrence, W. Dewey Lawrence, Tyler, Tex., Lawrence & Lawrence, Tyler, Tex., of counsel, for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and JONES and WATERMAN,1 Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Although this appeal stems from a bankruptcy proceeding in a United States District Court, In re Trice Production co., 251 F.Supp. 675, the substantive questions do not involve Federal law. These questions, we think, were properly resolved by the district court. To the extent that the procedural questions raised by the appellant were not waived, we find them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is free from error and it is

¶2

Affirmed.

1

Of the Second Circuit, sitting by designation

/360/f2d/212 · .json · Public domain