Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 360 F.2d 257 - Chernock v. Gardner

Chernock v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis

360 F.2d 257 · 1966

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
July 1995
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently July 1995 · most notably Glendal B. Webb v. Elliot L. Richardson (1972), Fenix v. Finch (1971)

25 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

1401966197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schilling v. Rogers · Panama Canal Company v. Grace Line Grace Line · Hobby v. Hodges · Ferry v. Udall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]ny individual, after any final decision of the Secretary ..., may obtain review of such decision”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “may ... prescribe the maximum fees that may be charged for services performed in connection with any claim”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) statutes preclude judicial review; or (2) agency action is committed to agency discretion by law”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.