National Labor Relations Board v. Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Co.’s Empirical Analysis
360 F.2d 569 · 1966
Citation profile
77 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 96 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2021 · most notably Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (1984), Rush Pettway, Etc. v. American Cast Iron Pipe Company, United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Intervenor (1974)
77 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Phelps Dodge Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Mastro Plastics Corporation and French American Reeds Manufacturing Company, Inc., Mastro Plastics Corporation and French American Reeds Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board · Nabors v. National Labor Relations Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when an employer's unlawful discrimination makes it impossible to determine whether a discharged employee would have earned backpay in the absence of discrimination, the uncertainty should be resolved against the employer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“reasonable efforts to find new employment which is substantially equivalent to the position from which he was discharged, and is suitable to a person of his background and experience.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The employee's duty [to seek interim employment] is based both on the doctrine of mitigation of damages and on the policy of promoting production and employment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.