United States v. Salliey’s Empirical Analysis
360 F.2d 699 · 1966
Citation profile
41 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently June 2007 · most notably United States v. Mandel (1979), Bayless v. United States (1967)
41 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 2314
Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Jones v. United States · Draper v. United States · Giordenello v. United States · Lyons v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal. (b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Whoever, with unlawful or fraudulent intent, transports in interstate or foreign commerce any falsely made, forged, altered, or counterfeited securities or tax stamps, knowing the same to have been falsely made, forged, altered or counterfeited * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“leaves no doubt as to under what circumstances the crime can be found to have been committed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Reilly v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.