Moore v. Strong’s Empirical Analysis
360 F.2d 71 · 1966
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 2009
7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation and Vanadium Corporation of America v. Frank Nisley, Jr., Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation and Vanadium Corporation of America v. John F. Wade, Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation and Vanadium Corporation of America v. Howard Balsley, Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation and Vanadium Corporation of America v. Unnamed · Ker v. California · Maddux v. Donaldson · Brooks v. United States · United States v. Sowards
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to develop material clarification. For this purpose, the presiding judge has not only the power but the duty to elicit the truth.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“given a reasonable meaning, and its application contemplates a lawful use of the highway by all drivers of vehicles thereon.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lester v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.