Leever v. Carson City’s Empirical Analysis
360 F.3d 1014 · 2004
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Toguchi v. Soon Hwang Chung (2004), Perfect Inc v. Ccbill Llc Cwie Llc (2007)
13 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 29 U.S.C. § 207
Relies on Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. · Robert Devereaux v. Timothy David Abbey · Alvarez v. IBP, Inc. · Reich v. New York City Transit Authority · Holzapfel v. Town of Newburgh
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, we must determine whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court correctly applied the relevant substantive law.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Certain training and "care” of a police dog at home by a canine officer is considered a part of the officer’s principal activities.... We consider the term "care” to mean bathing, brushing, exercising, feeding, grooming, related cleaning of the dog's kennel or transport vehicle, and similar activities performed by the canine officer at home on workdays as well as on days off duty or during vacation periods. Such work is considered to be compensable under the FLSA. Care also includes time spent in administering drugs or medicine for illness and/or transporting the dog to and from an animal hospital or veterinarian_the employer and the employee may work out a reasonable agreement as to compensable hours worked at home in canine care in addition to law enforcement work at the job site.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he [Township] has the burden of proving, plainly and unmistakably, that (1) there was an agreement to compensate [Krause and Martin] for [their] overtime work caring for [the dogs], and (2) the agreement was reasonable, having taken into account all of the pertinent facts.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)). The Sixth Circuit, on the other hand, has suggested that the employees must”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.