Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 360 F.3d 42 - Cosme-Rosado v. Serrano-Rodriguez

Cosme-Rosado v. Serrano-Rodriguez’s Empirical Analysis

360 F.3d 42 · 2004

Citation profile

99
cited by 99 later decisions
February 2025
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 72 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 99 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably González-de-Blasini v. Family Department (2004), Cabn Hernndez v. Philip Morris Usa Inc

18 federal appellate · 72 district ·

660200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Puerto Rico District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co. · Dusenbery v. United States · Ruiz Rivera v. Riley · Morales v. A.C. Orssleff's EFTF

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 99 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A party opposing a motion for summary judgment shall submit with its opposition a separate, short, and concise statement of material facts. The opposing statement shall admit, deny or qualify the facts by reference to each numbered paragraph of the moving party’s statement of material facts and unless a fact is admitted, shall support each denial or qualification by a record citation as required by this rule....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]e have consistently upheld the enforcement of [the District Court of Puerto Rico's local rule], noting repeatedly that `parties ignore [it] at their peril' and that `failure to present a statement of disputed facts, embroidered with specific citations to the record, justifies the court's deeming the facts presented in the movant's statement of undisputed facts admitted.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a separate, short, and concise statement of the material facts”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.