Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 360 F.3d 810 - Johnson

Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

20 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably Maxine Gail Veatch v. City of Waverly and Jason Leonard, Individually and in His Official Capacity (2015), 394 F. Supp. 2d 1090 - Brown v. Grant Holding, LLC (2005)

20 district · 1 state decisions

190200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. · United States v. Sherwood · Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Supreme Court has noted that, ‘in the usual case in which all federal[ ] law claims are eliminated before trial, the balance of factors to be considered under the pendent jurisdiction doctrine ... will point toward declining to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state[] law claims.’ ” Johnson v. City of Shore-wood, 360 F.3d 810 , 819 (8th Cir.2004) (quoting Camegie-Mellon Univ. v. Co-hill, 484 U.S. 343 , 350 n. 7 [ 108 S.Ct. 614 , 98 L.Ed.2d 720 ] (1988)). Accordingly, the court declines to exercise jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ state law claims against the City and Leonard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.