Hellman v. Weisberg’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White · Brooks v. City of San Mateo · Olsen v. Idaho State Board of Medicine · Coszalter v. City of Salem · Manatt v. Bank of America, NA
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he test of adverse employment action in the First Amendment context is substantially similar to the test under Title VII”); Boyd v. Peet, 249 Fed.Appx. 155, 158 (11th Cir.2007) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.