Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 360 F. Supp. 2d 90 - El v. Belden

360 F. Supp. 2d 90 - El v. Belden’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
October 2011
most recently cited

2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1406 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. · Goldlawr, Inc. v. Heiman · Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Unless changed by notice filed with the Clerk, the address ... of a party ... noted on the first filing shall be conclusively taken as the last known address ... of the party.”). 4 . Section 2000e-5(f)(3) also provides for venue “in the judicial district in which the aggrieved person would have worked but for the alleged unlawful employment practice.” 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(3). Further, if the respondent is not found within any of the aforementioned venues, a plaintiff may bring his/ her action”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Rauch v. Chertoff
  2. “Generally, transfers based on the interest of justice are favored over the dismissal of actions.” Asim El v. Balden, 360 F.Supp.2d 90, 93 (D.D.C.2004) (citing Goldlawr, Inc. v. Heiman, 369 U.S. 463, 466-67 , 82 S.Ct. 913 , 8 L.Ed.2d 39 (1962)). 3 . Although plaintiff claims that he”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Rauch v. Chertoff
  3. “shall dismiss [the case], or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Rauch v. Chertoff

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.