Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 360 N.C. 263 - O & M INDUSTRIES v. Smith Engineering Co.

O & M INDUSTRIES v. Smith Engineering Co.’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 39 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Electric Supply Co. of Durham, Inc. v. Swain Electrical Co. · Brown v. Flowe · CAROLINA BUILDERS CORPORATION v. Howard-Veasey Homes, Inc. · 72 N.C. App. 224 - Carolina Builders Corp. v. Howard-Veasey Homes, Inc. · Puckett v. Sellars

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he materialman’s lien statute is remedial in that it seeks to protect the interests of those who supply labor and materials that improve the value of the owner’s property. A remedial statute must be construed broadly in the light of the evils sought to be eliminated, the remedies intended to be applied, and the objective to be attained.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] remedial statute must be construed broadly 'in the light of the evils sought to be eliminated, the remedies intended to be applied, and the objective to be attained'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the first consideration in determining legislative intent is the words chosen by the legislature.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.