Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 360 N.C. 341 - State v. Smith

State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Estelle v. McGuire · Cupp v. Naughten · Francis v. Franklin · Boyde v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`give a clear instruction which applies the law to the evidence in such manner as to assist the jury in understanding the case and in reaching a correct verdict.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he burden upon the defendant is to show more than a possibility that the jury applied the instruction in an unconstitutional manner.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he appealing party must demonstrate that the error in the instructions was likely to mislead the jury. " Id. (emphasis added). "`In a criminal trial the judge has the duty to instruct the jury on the law arising from all the evidence presented.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.