State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Estelle v. McGuire · Cupp v. Naughten · Francis v. Franklin · Boyde v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`give a clear instruction which applies the law to the evidence in such manner as to assist the jury in understanding the case and in reaching a correct verdict.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barnes · State v. Moss“[t]he burden upon the defendant is to show more than a possibility that the jury applied the instruction in an unconstitutional manner.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he appealing party must demonstrate that the error in the instructions was likely to mislead the jury. " Id. (emphasis added). "`In a criminal trial the judge has the duty to instruct the jury on the law arising from all the evidence presented.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.