Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 360 NW2D 468 - Isker v. Gardner

Isker v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
August 2003
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp. · Springrose v. Willmore · Olson v. Hansen · Conover v. Northern States Power Co. · Coenen v. Buckman Building Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence suggested [the plaintiff] was familiar with the hazards of careless snowmobile operation and appreciated dangers in a fall during that kind of activity. The record shows no evidence that [the plaintiff] protested or cautioned [the snowmobile driver] about his manner of driving even though [the plaintiff] stated that he momentarily lost his balance on the first of three successive jumps over the snowbanks bordering Marsh Street.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.