State v. Barnthouse’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that, for the purposes of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, law enforcement illegally seized [the] package by removing it from the stream of mail and submitting it to a dog sniff.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sholedice“Subject to certain limited exceptions, a search or seizure is unreasonable and, therefore, unlawful under Article I, section 9, unless it is supported by probable cause and a warrant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lien“explained that [the] defendant could refuse consent, but that, if he refused, the officers would apply for a search warrant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sholedice
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.