Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 360 OR 403 - State v. Barnthouse

State v. Barnthouse’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that, for the purposes of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, law enforcement illegally seized [the] package by removing it from the stream of mail and submitting it to a dog sniff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Subject to certain limited exceptions, a search or seizure is unreasonable and, therefore, unlawful under Article I, section 9, unless it is supported by probable cause and a warrant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “explained that [the] defendant could refuse consent, but that, if he refused, the officers would apply for a search warrant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.