Barrett v. Peters’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000C
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is the appropriate defendant in a habeas proceeding, whether he or she has physical, or only constructive, custody of the petitioner.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Garges v. Premo“officer or person by whom the party is imprisoned or restrained.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Garges v. Premo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.