In Re Dumas

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 6, 2002

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 2002-12-06

Cited by 10 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2016

9 state decisions

Relies on In re Dumas

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-12-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

¶2 By Opinion dated July 20, 1992, petitioner was disbarred from the practice of law in South Carolina. In the Matter of Dumas, 309 S.C. 5, 419 S.E.2d 791 (1992). Petitioner has now filed a petition for reinstatement. The Committee on Character and Fitness recommended that the petition be denied. We disagree with the recommendation of the Committee on Character and Fitness and hereby reinstate petitioner to the practice of law in this state.

¶3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Jean H. Toal, C.J. s/James E. Moore, J. s/John H. Waller, Jr., J. s/E.C. Burnett, III, J. s/Costa M. Pleicones, J.