Harden v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Blockburger v. United States · Hill v. Lockhart · Garrett v. United States · Brightman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]n order to satisfy the 'prejudice' requirement, the defendant must show there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, he would not have pled guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Frierson v. State“no statutory law or judicial precedent in this State . . . holds a conviction for both conspiracy and the substantive offense relating to the conspiracy . . . constitutes double jeopardy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Winkler v. State“An attorney is not required to anticipate potential changes in the law which are not in existence at the time of the conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Winkler v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.