360 So. 2d 128 - Stanfill v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 2014
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 349 So. 2d 837 - State v. Ansley · State Ex Rel. Seal v. Shepard · 284 So. 2d 9 - State Ex Rel. Miller v. Patterson · 342 So. 2d 134 - Holmes v. State · Diggs v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“leaving. We resolve this conflict by adopting the first district's holding that section 316.027 creates but one crime, a felony. We further hold that the indictment in this case was defective and prevented petitioner from properly preparing his defense. Petitioner, James Rickey Stanfill, was charged by indictment with one count of manslaughter and three counts of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stanfill v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.