Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

360 So. 2d 147

Prunty v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1978-06-29

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1986

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1978-06-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Each appellant seeks review of an allegedly excessive sentence imposed following his voluntary plea of guilty to an amended information charging attempted robbery contrary to Sections 812.13 and 777.04, Fla.Stat. (1975). The information as amended contained no allegations concerning use of a firearm, deadly weapon, or other weapon. See Sections 812.13(2)(a) and 812.13(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (1975). Each appellant was adjudicated guilty of attempted robbery.

¶2The information as amended alleged an attempt to commit the offense proscribed by Section 812.13(2)(c) Fla.Stat. (1975). The maximum term of imprisonment for this offense is five years. Section 777.-04(4)(c), Fla.Stat. (1975). The sentences imposed on appellants are thus excessive and illegal. The sentences are vacated and the cases are remanded for proper sentencing under Sections 812.13(2)(c) and 777.04(4)(c), Fla.Stat. (1975). Appellants need not be present for resentencing.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and SMITH and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
/360/so2d/147 · .json · Public domain