¶1The only substantial question presented on this appeal is whether the trial court properly applied the test set forth in Marshall v. Papineau, 132 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961); and Reeder v. Edward M. Chadbourne, Inc., 338 So.2d 271 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), in excluding the testimony of an expert witness. Our review of the record shows no error.
¶2Affirmed.