Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 360 So. 2d 582 - Jackson v. Watson

360 So. 2d 582 - Jackson v. Watson’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 1992
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 1992

13 state decisions

100197819801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Canter v. Koehring Company · 320 So. 2d 134 - Miller v. Chicago Insurance Company · Foster v. Kaplan Rice Mill, Inc. · Reggio v. Louisiana Gas Service Co. · 340 So. 2d 421 - Perrin v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error. Stated another way, the reviewing court must give great weight to factual conclusions of the trier of fact, where there is conflict in the testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbed upon review, even though the appellate court may feel that its own evaluations and inferences are as reasonable.” Id at 724.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““First, it must be shown plaintiff was in a position of peril of which he was unaware or from which he was unable to extricate himself. Second, the defendant was in a position to discover plaintiff’s peril. And third, when defendant did in fact discover plaintiff’s peril, he had reasonable opportunity to avoid the accident.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.