Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 360 So. 2d 721 - Hellums v. Hager

360 So. 2d 721 - Hellums v. Hager’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2014

10 state decisions

5019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 55 Ala. App. 701 - City of Tuscaloosa v. Howard · Ingalls Shipbuilding Corporation v. Cahela · 342 So. 2d 918 - Young v. City of Huntsville · Davis v. Standard Oil Co. of Kentucky

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n order for there to be an 'accident' within the intent of the Workmen's Compensation Act, the injury suffered by the claimant must be legally caused by the performance of his duties and a causal relationship of a medical nature must exist between claimant's injury and his job.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"[A]rthritis caused by an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of employment must be considered an injury. . . . Consequently, if an incident occurring during the performance of claimant's job is deemed to have caused his arthritic condition or aggravated an existing arthritic condition, the trial court may properly hold that the claimant is the victim of an accident and that he is entitled to receive workmen's compensation benefits."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.