Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 360 So. 2d 760 - Willinsky v. State

360 So. 2d 760 - Willinsky v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
February 1997
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 1997

17 state decisions

130197819801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Doyle v. Ohio · United States v. Hale · 335 So. 2d 5 - Shannon v. State · Bennett v. State · Akin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Impeachment by disclosure of the legitimate exercise of the right to silence is a denial of due process. It should not be material at what stage the accused was silent so long as the right to silence is protected at that stage. The language in Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610 , 96 S.Ct. 2240 , 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976) and United States v. Hale, 422 U.S. 171 , 95 S.Ct. 2133 , 45 L.Ed.2d 99 (1975), although set in the context of silence at arrest, reflects a general policy.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.