Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

360 So. 2d 783

Hanks v. Wainwright

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1978-04-21

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 1979

2 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“(1) If a prisoner is convicted of escape, or if the clemency or parole granted to him is revoked, the Department of Offender Rehabilitation may, without notice or hearing, declare a forfeiture of all gain-time earned and extra gain-time allowed such prisoner, if any, prior to such escape or his release under such clemency or parole, as the case may be.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Wright v. Wainwright

Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · 351 F. Supp. 1306 - Rankin v. Wainwright · Morgan v. Cook

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1978-04-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Hanks, an inmate, petitions for writ of habeas corpus. He is serving consecutive five year sentences for two escape convictions. His accumulated gain-time was taken away without notice or hearing due to those convictions. He contends he was denied due process as afforded by Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974). The state merely responds by quoting Section 944.28(1) (1977), which permits the Division, without notice or hearing, to declare a forfeiture of all gain-time earned by the prisoner prior to escape following his conviction for escape.

¶2Despite the intriguing question raised by petitioner and the inadequate return by the state, we are compelled to deny the petition. The Florida Supreme Court in Morgan v. Cook, 344 So.2d 577 (Fla.1977) considered the same point and found 944.28(1) constitutional, relying on Rankin v. Wainwright, 351 F.Supp. 1306 (M.D.Fla.1972). Our review of the record in Morgan v. Cook shows petitioner pled guilty and was sentenced to six months for his escape. Although the rationale is not set out in the opinion, apparently the Supreme Court found the judicial determination of guilt in the escape attempt was sufficient due process for the forfeiture of gain-time.

¶3The petition is DENIED.

MILLS, A. C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
/360/so2d/783 · .json · Public domain